Russia, Azerbaijan announce withdrawal of peacekeepers from Karabakh
Signaling a new phase in post-conflict dynamics
ANALYTICS 18 April 2024 - 17:46
Fuad Muxtar-Agbabali |
The recent announcement of Russia pulling out its peacekeeping forces from Azerbaijan’s Karabakh region represents a notable shift in the post-conflict landscape of the South Caucasus region.
This move significantly improves relations between Baku and Moscow, as tensions between Russia and Armenia escalate, and diplomatic ties between Russia and Georgia remain virtually non-existent.
Following the trilateral peace deal, brokered by Russia on November 10, 2020, between Azerbaijan and Armenia, which ended the active hostilities in Karabakh and surrounding territories, the presence of Russian peacekeepers has been crucial in maintaining stability and facilitating the implementation of ceasefire agreements despite shortcomings and failures.
The decision to withdraw the peacekeepers, as officially confirmed by Russia and Azerbaijan, signals a shift in the security landscape of Karabakh, which is being rebuilt from scratch.
“This is indeed the case,” Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the Interfax news agency on April 17 in response to media inquiries without giving a timeframe for the withdrawal.
Azerbaijani presidential top foreign policy aide Hikmat Hajiyev in remarks for the state news agency Azertac also confirmed that a withdrawal agreement had been struck.
“The early withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers, temporarily stationed in the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan per the trilateral statement signed on November 10, 2020, has been decided by the leaders of both countries,” Azertac quoted Hajiyev as saying.
The move not only underscores the progress made in terms of stabilizing the region but also reflects the confidence of Azerbaijan in the sustainability of the peace process. The presidential aide highlights the collaborative approach between the two countries, which underscores a shared commitment to upholding the terms of the peace agreement and ensuring a smooth transition in the security arrangements of Karabakh.
The swift endorsement of the withdrawal agreement elicited jubilant and resoundingly positive reactions from Azerbaijani experts and politicians across a spectrum of political factions. This enthusiastic response underscored a robust national consensus within Azerbaijan, highlighting the widespread recognition of the significant implications of the development.
Experts and politicians alike hailed the withdrawal agreement as a testament to Azerbaijan's diplomatic prowess and strategic acumen, viewing it as a decisive step towards consolidating peace and stability in the region.
Furthermore, the unified support from diverse political factions underscores the collective understanding of the benefits of this milestone. It transcends partisan divides, emphasizing a shared commitment to advancing Azerbaijan's interests on the international stage and solidifying its position as a regional leader.
The jubilation expressed by Azerbaijani stakeholders also speaks to the tangible impact of the withdrawal agreement on the lives of ordinary citizens. With the prospect of a reduced military presence and increased stability, there is a palpable sense of optimism about the future trajectory of Karabakh and its surrounding areas.
In essence, the enthusiastic endorsement of the withdrawal agreement symbolizes not only a moment of triumph for Azerbaijani diplomacy but also a reaffirmation of the nation's unwavering determination to pursue peace, prosperity, and security for its citizens and the wider region.
The presence of nearly 2,000 Russian peacekeeping personnel in Karabakh since the 2020 trilateral peace deal has been instrumental in preventing further escalations and fostering an environment conducive to negotiations and reconciliation efforts. However, the decision to withdraw these forces indicates confidence in the progress achieved thus far and a belief in the ability of Azerbaijan to maintain the security of the region on its own.
Azerbaijan's complex relationship with foreign armies
In the collective mindset of Azerbaijanis, the presence of foreign troops within the country's borders has long been regarded as a complex and potentially destabilizing factor. It evokes a sense of vulnerability and a perceived erosion of full independence, often intertwined with a deep-seated inferiority complex shaped by historical occupations and geopolitical realities.
Following Azerbaijan's hard-won independence in 1991, the withdrawal of Russian military forces in 1992 was seen as a crucial step towards asserting sovereignty and reclaiming control over national security affairs. However, the subsequent redeployment of Russian peacekeepers to the region in 2020, and the absence of a peace treaty reignited apprehensions and fueled speculation within certain segments of Azerbaijani society. Against this backdrop, the start of the withdrawal triggered positive reactions by Azerbaijani experts and politicians.
Azerbaijan stands unique among its peers in the Eastern Partnership Organization as the sole nation devoid of foreign military bases within its borders. This absence not only underscores Azerbaijan's commitment to maintaining sovereign control over its territory but also reflects a strategic stance that prioritizes self-reliance and autonomy in defense affairs.
Amidst a region where external military presence is often a geopolitical reality, Azerbaijan's position highlights its determination to chart an independent course and safeguard its national security interests without reliance on foreign forces.
This distinction within the Eastern Partnership Organization underscores Azerbaijan's status as a key player in shaping regional security dynamics while upholding the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity.
World media peacekeepers' withdrawal from Azerbaijan
The global media swiftly responded to the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from Azerbaijan’s Karabakh region. Notably, their reporting marked a departure from clichéd narratives and refrained from questioning the territorial belonging of Karabakh.
The Washington Post provided a balanced account, stating, “Russian forces are being withdrawn from Azerbaijan’s Karabakh region, where they served as peacekeepers since the cessation of hostilities in 2020.”
The report acknowledged the historical context, noting that “the Karabakh region had previously been under the control of ethnic Armenian separatists until the 2020 conflict, which resulted in Azerbaijan regaining control of the territory.”
Politico, exhibiting a pro-Armenian bias, reported, “Russia will withdraw all of its nearly 2,000 troops from Azerbaijan’s Karabakh region,” further suggesting, “despite their peacekeeping mandate until at least the end of 2025, Moscow is reallocating resources amid its conflict with Ukraine.”
Highlighting the geographical context, Politico noted “the mountainous area, located within Azerbaijan’s internationally recognized borders, had been under the rule of Armenian separatists as the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh republic since a war that ensued after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.”
Le Monde, aligning with Macron's stance perceived as critical of Azerbaijan, covered the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from Karabakh following "Azerbaijan's reclaiming of the contested territory from Armenian separatists last year".
Al Jazeera reported on Russia's withdrawal of peacekeepers from Azerbaijan's Karabakh, noting Armenia's accusation of Moscow for failing to safeguard Armenian interests, which Russia denied.
Originally slated to remain until November 2025, their withdrawal coincides with broader regional tensions, including Armenia's demand for the removal of Russian border guards from its primary airport and protests in Georgia against a perceived pro-Russian government stance.
Caliber.Az
1
|
Kazakhstan denies sale of military airplanes to Ukraine
28 April 2024 - 14:26
|
2
|
Critical F-35 upgrade deferred, 2024 production slashed by 27-50%
01 May 2024 - 09:05
|
3
|
Armenian Church sparks controversy amid handover of villages to Azerbaijan Unrest & dissent in Armenia
30 April 2024 - 18:02
|
4
|
Mr Fouks - the servant of too many masters How much does the reputation cost?
29 April 2024 - 17:15
|
5
|
French journalist's hunger strike in Yerevan airport over politically driven entry ban Why are Armenia's friends silent?
29 April 2024 - 12:41
|
Europeans have more time, Americans more money
Which is better?01 May 2024 - 23:01
Iran's supreme leader says Palestine must be returned to its true owners
01 May 2024 - 21:02
BRICS de-dollarization threatens US economy, JP Morgan CEO predicts
01 May 2024 - 20:49
Azerbaijani president welcomes Iraqi Parliament Speaker, highlights bilateral cooperation & intercultural dialog
01 May 2024 - 20:38
Why is Bob ‘Gold Bars’ Menendez still sitting in US Senate?
01 May 2024 - 20:33
Maltese National Commission: Azerbaijan achieves significant progress over past 20 years
01 May 2024 - 20:19
Azerbaijani premier meets Malaysian Parliament Senate president
01 May 2024 - 20:10
Azerbaijan continues clearing Karabakh of mines
01 May 2024 - 20:02
UAE takes precautions ahead of expected storm
01 May 2024 - 19:47
Azerbaijani president meets UN Assistant Sec-Gen for Rule of Law & Security Institutions
01 May 2024 - 19:36
US ex-president: Israel having most sophisticated equipment could prevent October 7 attack
01 May 2024 - 19:31
ICESCO Director-General invited to COP29
01 May 2024 - 19:22
Minister: Agro sector greatly important in Azerbaijan's economy
01 May 2024 - 19:14
Interreligious dialog key focus at VI World Forum in Baku
Combating radicalism & protecting sacred sites01 May 2024 - 19:05
UN chief urges Israel to prevent tragedy in Rafah
01 May 2024 - 18:56
Azerbaijani Special Forces adopt anti-drone systems for enhanced defense
01 May 2024 - 18:28
Russian air defence forces shoot down 29 Ukraine drones
01 May 2024 - 18:25
Turkey explores joining lawsuit against Israel initiated by South Africa
01 May 2024 - 18:16
European Parliament calls for stripping Georgia of EU candidate status
01 May 2024 - 18:07
Azerbaijani FM, UNESCO reps discuss COP29, regional situation
01 May 2024 - 17:50
Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan sign memorandum of cooperation on interconnection of energy systems
01 May 2024 - 17:41
Paris & Baku trade barbs amid escalating tensions
Geopolitical showdown01 May 2024 - 17:39
Official COP29 website appears
01 May 2024 - 17:34
Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan to expand cooperation in several spheres
01 May 2024 - 17:22
UN official: Everyone should make efforts to establish peace accross globe
01 May 2024 - 17:16
Indonesia volcano eruption spreads ash to Malaysia, shutting airports
01 May 2024 - 16:59
Azerbaijani president welcomes delegation of North Caucasus muftis
PHOTO/UPDATED01 May 2024 - 16:57
Bitcoin price dips below $58,000 first time in two months
01 May 2024 - 16:44
Foreign military attachés visit Azerbaijan's Higher Military School, gain insight into operations
01 May 2024 - 16:28
Israel is ready to launch operation in Rafah
Make or break?01 May 2024 - 16:15
Iraq sets up military bases on border with Türkiye
01 May 2024 - 16:11
Hungary against Armenia’s militarisation
Budapest’s justice01 May 2024 - 15:54
Trump hints at potential political violence if not elected in November
01 May 2024 - 15:37
COP29 participants to have easier entry to Azerbaijan
01 May 2024 - 15:28
UN rep applauds Azerbaijan-Armenia border agreements at World Forum
01 May 2024 - 15:19
Scandal, bullying and iconoclasm: How MEPs lost their political way
Euronews article on EU policy01 May 2024 - 15:01
Director General: ICESCO proud of its cooperation with Azerbaijan
01 May 2024 - 14:45
Ukrainian drones hit Ryazan Oil Refinery, sparking fire
VIDEO01 May 2024 - 14:31
Kazakh leader welcomes Baku, Yerevan's decision to hold peace talks in Almaty
01 May 2024 - 14:16
UNESCO eyes to intensify cooperation with Azerbaijan
01 May 2024 - 14:01