Dialogue with the Pharisees Meditations of Emin Galaly

In general, it is better not to communicate with people of this category. Pharisee, he is a Pharisee - without any reference to the origin of the term. However, if the conversation were possible, there would be a lot of interesting things in it.

They often look decent, flaunt in solid suits, and utter, at first glance, very humane considerations from high stands. What will we talk about? Let us discuss the hypocrites and moral hypocrites, like mushrooms after the rain, trying to reason what is good and what is bad, as in a well-known rhyme. Moreover, they themselves show the initiative to speak with us.

Well, interlocutors, get started.

A humanitarian crisis, a blockade, a threat to the lives of civilians, and an attempt to use them as hostages in resolving political (and military) issues. Are you saying it is unacceptable? All right. It is a crime. Contradicts both morality and international law. In addition, although the world has not succeeded in punishing the villains, some especially distinguished ones had to answer for the above. Nevertheless, what do you want from us?

Blockade of territories inhabited by Armenians? A violation of humanitarian law? Oh, do not say that! Go on, go on. Women and children should not become victims of armed and other confrontations. I do subscribe. What else? Tell me about the responsibility, I do not mind. Did everyone say?

Maybe, you add about the long-suffering of the Armenian people? Also true. Armenians often suffer. Reminds me of the suffering fantasies of adolescents in puberty. Now is not about that. I heard what you said. May I answer? You may not have allowed it, but we use our right of reply, regardless of your desire.

The most natural, even instinctive, desire is to ask where today's hyperactive compassionate team was in the late 1980s - early 1990s, and then 30 years of the most infamous violation of the rights of my nation? I would like to ask why you were silent when we were killed and expelled from our own land. When hundreds of thousands of people huddled in tent cities. When the head of a neighboring country boasted of killing civilians. Surely, the beasts in human form, who set the goal of destroying the Azerbaijanis, did not report to you about his successes?!

I want to, but I will not ask. It would be an emotional response that does not stand up to neutral criticism. Crimes committed against Azerbaijanis do not give us (Azerbaijanis) the right to commit them against anyone. We cannot sin even against those who have sinned against us. The talk is not about “who are the judges?”, but about the fact that there is no subject for trial. Unless for a trial, but we do not give a hoot about it.

What are our sins? Having freed our land from filth, and restoring what the Armenians - you love - have destroyed for thirty years, we no longer want to live on a time bomb and wait for the viper to try to sting again. No one aims to expel or, God forbid, exterminate the Armenians living in the territory of Azerbaijan. You can count - and by virtue of your diabolical convictions, driven only by you, most likely consider this land to be Armenian. It is your right, but also your problem. International law, as well as non-recognition of the "promised land Armenia-2" proves something else. This is the land of Azerbaijan.

After all, you know that the “games of famine” started by fake mother Teresas (and dads too) will lead to the continuation of the bloody dream of secession, which brought so much grief and misfortune to both Azerbaijan and Armenia. Okay, Azerbaijani blood for you is like water in a downpour - it flows, and let it. What about the Armenian blood? If Armenians are really dear to you and you care about their well-being, why are you indulging in such selective humanism, in which salvation from the forced eating of domestic animals and even cannibalism (which are not even in sight, which is proved by the joyful physiques of the inhabitants of Khankandi, comfortably gourmet, despite the " blockade") only in products brought along one very specific route?

Do you want to force Baku to open the Lachin road, to resume the conveyor of death, through which the poison of unrealizable hopes and weapons for attempts to implement them will again flow? Give Armenians a reason to believe that their whims and desire to eat bread from a specific Armenian, and no other flour, outweigh the torment and deprivation that the region faced through the fault of Armenian dreamers and their patrons?

But did you not spend an hour purring to the “miatsum” initiators in the 1980s that happiness is close and you just need to push a little to achieve what you want? Did you not let the monster be nipped in the bud, justifying and defending the murderous instigators, and defamating the stunned victims, who tried in vain to achieve justice? This does not come off as a surprise.

After all, even today you are not averse to postponing the decision of the issue for an indefinite time, in order to bring a match to a powder keg at the right time for you. Ultimately, even today, without batting an eyelid, you talk about the rights of the “people of Artsakh”, easily forgetting about the terrible price of trying to prove that the chimera is real. Even today, you do not want peace and stability in the region.

I will probably correct myself. As for “not throwing firewood into the fire” at the beginning of the article, I obviously got excited. They throw up and not only firewood but also add oil. Moreover, pretending that it is foam for extinguishing a fire.

It is not customary to quote Russian statesmen these days. Russia is not popular. Everyone knows why. Better than one of her autocrats said - I do not remember exactly which one, and I am reluctant to google - her best allies are the army and navy. The rule is universal. True, with the amendments made by time.

The best allies of any country are a strong army capable of enforcing international law in relation to the state it protects, a powerful economy, and a society united in the name of the Motherland. In addition, in truly close countries, the sincere brotherly attitude of the nations backed up by common geopolitical interests. Then the howling of the hypocrites-Lucifers will deafen only those who howl.

Moreover, the last - in a rhyme about what is good and what is bad, instructions were given to an unreasonable crumb. Although we are a small country, we did not sign up for “crumbs”. They exhorted us for a long time, shrugging their hands - that's how it is, your land, but what can you do! Humble yourself.

We have not reconciled. We put straitjackets on bloody lunatics.