Pro-Israel silencing machine starting to crack Macklemore’s case shows the risks of backing Palestine are easing
The removal of US rapper Macklemore from Ed Sheeran’s tour after he spoke in support of Palestine has triggered a backlash that has brought renewed attention to the issue, according to an opinion article published by Al Jazeera.
Macklemore was dropped from Sheeran’s US tour after making pro-Palestinian remarks on stage. The decision was followed by the withdrawal of fellow performers Finneas, Lukas Graham, Aaron Rowe and Beoga from the tour.
In the article, published on September 20, Palestinian political analyst and playwright Ahmed Najar argued that the episode showed a changing cost for artists who publicly support Palestine.
Macklemore pledged the $1 million he had earned from his appearances to six organisations supporting Palestinians, while media reports said Sheeran would donate $2 million towards humanitarian relief in the region, Najar wrote.
The columnist also cited a $1 million pledge from children's educator Ms Rachel and argued that attempts to restrict pro-Palestinian messages had instead generated further attention and donations.
Najar pointed to changing public attitudes towards Israel, citing a Pew Research Center survey across 36 countries that found a median of 67% of respondents held an unfavourable view of Israel.
The article also referred to findings and actions by international bodies concerning the Gaza war, including a United Nations Commission of Inquiry conclusion that Israel committed genocide in Gaza and International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The author argued that social media and direct reporting from Gaza had made it harder for established institutions to control how the conflict was presented to international audiences.
The backlash over Macklemore’s removal also put pressure on Sheeran to address the issue publicly. At a concert in Philadelphia on Saturday, he described what was happening in Gaza as “unjustifiable”, according to Najar.
“Speaking for Palestine can still carry a professional cost,” Najar wrote. “But increasingly, censors may discover that silencing pro-Palestine voices carries a cost, too.”
By Aghakazim Guliyev







