Syrian government, US-backed forces talks stall over sovereignty dispute

Ongoing negotiations between the Syrian government and the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have reached a deadlock, with officials and sources close to the talks attributing the impasse to the SDF’s unwillingness to compromise on key issues outlined in the March 10 agreement.

Despite active mediation efforts by US Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack and the participation of European observers, including France, the latest round of discussions ended without significant breakthroughs. According to sources speaking to Levant 24, the Syrian government reaffirmed its commitment to national unity and the integration of all local institutions and military forces under a centralised Syrian state, rejecting demands for decentralisation or federalism, Caliber.Az cites.

“The Syrian government remains committed to the unity of the nation and the inclusion of all citizens in state institutions,” a source informed Levant 24. “But meaningful progress requires mutual flexibility, which has not been forthcoming from the SDF.”

The SDF continues to insist on preserving its military structure and advancing a model of decentralised governance in northeastern Syria, positions Damascus views as incompatible with Syrian sovereignty and the provisions of the March agreement signed between President Ahmad al-Shara and SDF commander Mazloum Abdi. 

Officials revealed that all solutions proposed by the Syrian Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Interior, and Defence were rejected by the SDF during recent talks, prompting the American delegation to briefly withdraw from the session in frustration.

The negotiations come amid internal tensions within the SDF. Last month, SDF forces arrested at least 20 Arab commanders in Deir Ezzor, sparking accusations of marginalization and abuse of power. Local tribal leaders have criticized what they see as a campaign to purge Arab influence from key positions, further complicating prospects for reconciliation with Damascus.

The US and Syrian sides had hoped the March 10 agreement would provide a framework for the full reintegration of the northeast—including its vital oil and gas assets—into the Syrian state. The deal also promised constitutional guarantees for Kurdish citizens and emphasized the rejection of sectarianism and division. However, recent moves by the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES) to challenge the constitutional process and seek new concessions have drawn criticism from both the Syrian government and Western observers.

The US and France remain involved in overseeing the implementation of the March agreement, scheduled to conclude by the end of the year. Damascus has warned that continued delays risk deepening instability and prolonging the administrative vacuum in northeastern Syria.

“The path forward exists,” a Syrian official said. “But if the SDF continues to place rigid ideological demands above national unity, progress will remain stalled.”

The Syrian government reiterated that the Kurdish community remains a vital component of Syria’s social fabric and encouraged all parties to return to the principles of national unity and sovereignty. Barrack emphasised, “The SDF must accept that Syria is one country, one army, one people. Federalism won’t work here. The only path for SDF negotiations is the path to Damascus.”

By Sabina Mammadli