Ukraine wants American cluster bombs—quickly

The Economist has published an article about American cluster bombs, saying that they would help the Ukrainian counter-offensive. Caliber.Az reprints the article.

America and its allies have constantly debated whether to send Ukraine the next big thing: first artillery, then tanks and after that jets. Each taboo has crumbled in turn. But as Ukraine’s counter-offensive approaches its second month, with progress still slow, a few weapons remain on its wishlist. One is the 150km-range Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb (GLSDB), which America has pledged but not yet dispatched. The second is the 300km-range ATACMS missile, which America remains wary of supplying. The third may be the most important: the humble cluster bomb.

Cluster munitions are “area effect” weapons which release a larger number of smaller bomblets. They were developed in the second world war to hit multiple targets dispersed over a wide area, particularly infantry and soft-skinned vehicles.

The development of shaped charges, which channel explosive energy in a particular direction, allowed later cluster munitions to destroy armour, too. Ukraine has asked America to supply dual-purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM), a class of cluster munition that America is phasing out and which could be fired from howitzers or from the HIMARS rocket launchers that Ukraine has been receiving for around a year.

America itself has not used cluster bombs in action since the first weeks of the Iraq war in 2003. But even those countries that disavow their use recognise that they can be potent weapons. In an article for the British Army Review published in 2019, a British brigadier noted that American DPICMs had “saved the day time and again” by breaking up big enemy formations during division-level exercises.

“They were, and are, a game-changer.” On June 22nd Laura Cooper, a Pentagon official, told Congress that the department’s military analysts had confirmed that DPICMs “would be useful especially against dug-in Russian positions”—precisely the sort Ukraine is currently assaulting in its counter-offensive.

In recent days, Ukraine has consolidated bridgeheads at three points over the Dnieper river in the south-western part of the front, south of the destroyed Kakhovka dam. Ukraine’s army has also continued to make modest gains around the eastern town of Bakhmut. But its attacks in the south, in Zaporizhia and Donetsk provinces, have been frustratingly slow. Ukraine and its Western partners had expected Russia to fall back to its prepared defences. Instead, it has fought further forward, forcing Ukraine to absorb higher casualties and expend more ammunition than planned.

Ben Hodges, a former commander of the US Army in Europe, says that cluster munitions could suppress Russian fire from trenches and artillery, giving Ukraine more time to clear a path through minefields, which are proving to be a serious problem. One formal study conducted recently by a NATO country suggests that in a division-sized operation to break through well-prepared complex defences, the use of cluster munitions could save around 1,000 Ukrainian lives, though officials concede that the figures are hazy.

There are other advantages, too. The area effect means that cluster bombs can be fired more quickly than ordinary high-explosive rounds, since the attacker needs less precise intelligence on the target, allowing the gun to scoot away faster. On top of that, the supply of DPICMs would also ease pressure on ordinary artillery shells, which are in short supply, and on the overworked barrels that fire them. “I cannot see how momentum can be maintained without them,” says a Western official.

There is a catch. The Convention on Cluster Munitions, finalised in 2008, bans the use, transfer, production and stockpiling of the weapons. Neither America, Ukraine nor Russia are signatories, but 25 out of 31 NATO allies are. America has not thus far provided DPICMs, said Ms Cooper, for two reasons: “existing congressional restrictions…and concerns about allied unity”. Germany is blocking Estonia’s proposed transfer of old German cluster munitions.

The convention itself reflects humanitarian concerns. Bomblets, by design, disperse over a wide area, with unexploded ones posing a risk to civilians long after a war is over. Israel’s use of the weapons in 2006 may have contaminated 13 square miles of Lebanese territory, including a huge amount of arable land. Bomblets can also pose a problem for friendly forces: they killed 22 American personnel in Iraq in 1991, during the first Gulf war, slowing down an advance on Kuwait airport.

“There are much better options than saturating your country with de facto landmines,” argues Marc Garlasco, a military adviser at PAX for peace, a Dutch NGO. “These will kill and maim your soldiers and civilians for decades.” They are “heinous weapons”, agrees Mary Wareham of Human Rights Watch (HRW), another NGO.

Ukrainians retort that they are the ones best placed to judge the trade-off between firepower today and civilian harm on their territory tomorrow. They insist that they would carefully map where the munitions are used, abstain from firing them in urban areas and commit to a post-war de-mining programme. In any case, any taboo over using cluster bombs has already been broken: both Ukraine and Russia have already fired Soviet-era ones at scale, according to data collected by HRW, and Ukraine is also firing some supplied by Türkiye. As of April, over 174,000 square kilometres of territory was contaminated with explosive objects.

Nor are the weapons as hazardous as they once were. Around 2.5 per cent to 5 per cent of the bomblets in America’s older DPICMs fail to explode, remaining a potential danger to civilians for years to come, says an American artillery expert. The dud rate for newer ones is as low as 0.5 per cent, with an average of 1.2 per cent. The equivalent rate for the Soviet-type cluster munitions already scattered over Ukraine is probably an order of magnitude higher, says the expert, worsened by poor maintenance.

“You’d be shocked at the level of corrosion and disrepair,” says the expert. Whatever America decides—it is thought to be leaning towards a delivery—Ukraine will be dealing with unexploded ordinance for decades to come.