Trump’s $200 million White House ballroom plan draws criticism over cost, timing

US President Donald Trump’s plan to construct a $200 million ballroom at the White House is facing backlash from critics who call the project extravagant and poorly timed amid economic concerns.

According to the White House, construction will begin in September and be funded by Trump and private donors. The 90,000-square-foot ballroom will be built adjacent to the East Wing and is expected to be completed before the end of Trump’s term in January 2029, Caliber.Az reports via The Hill. 

“I always said I was going to do something about the ballroom because they should have one,” Trump told reporters on July 31. “So we’ll be leaving it, it will be a great legacy project. And, I think it will be special.”

Trump also confirmed no taxpayer money will be used.

“No government dollars, no,” he said.

The president envisions the space as a venue for state dinners and large-scale events, eliminating the need for outdoor tents.

“When it rains it’s a disaster… The women with their lovely evening gowns, their hair all done, and they’re a mess by the time they get [there],” he said.

The White House says the Rose Garden is also being paved to improve accessibility for events, though the rose bushes will remain. Trump has reportedly added his signature gold decor to the Oval Office as well.

A West Wing spokesperson defended the initiative: “President Trump is the best builder and developer in the entire world and the American people can rest well knowing that this project is in his hands.”

While past presidents have made lasting changes to the White House, critics argue Trump’s project is excessive.

“This is what DOGE was all about, folks,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), referring to Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency. “Cutting things from you… giving it to the big shots who run the show.”

“This isn’t something that’s going to make or break another election, but it does add another page to the catalog of hypocrisy…,” said Democratic strategist Antjuan Seawright.

Journalist Seth Abramson suggested the project is a distraction.

“On to more important things! Did you hear Trump is building a $200M ballroom at the White House? Wowee!”

The White House Historical Association supports the plan, noting that past additions like the Truman Balcony and East Wing were once controversial.

“The history of the White House has evolved over 233 years… but today, we can’t imagine the White House without these iconic elements,” said Stewart McLaurin, president of the association.

Some historians acknowledge the need for a proper event space.

“I can understand why someone who thinks on a grand scale… would want this ballroom added,” said Barbara Perry of the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. But she also noted the political optics: “It will probably have an impact on how [critics] view this.”

Former chief of staff Anita McBride noted logistical issues with temporary outdoor tents. “You’re not really having your event in the White House,” she said.

The ballroom’s location raises questions about the future of the East Wing, home to the first lady’s staff and public tours.

“What will be the new East Wing?” McBride asked. “The heart of the White House is the East Wing."

By Sabina Mammadli