Slovak parliament backs resolution opposing further sanctions on Russia

The Slovak Parliament has passed a resolution rejecting the imposition of new sanctions against Russia, citing concerns over national economic and energy interests. 

The resolution, initiated by the Slovak National Party (SNS), calls on the Slovak government to refrain from supporting any future restrictive measures targeting the Russian Federation, Caliber.Az reports via foreign media.

"There were 76 MPs present, 51 voted in favour, one against, and 23 abstained. The proposal has been approved," announced Speaker of Parliament Richard Raši following the vote on June 5. 

The resolution, supported by SNS—a member of Slovakia’s ruling coalition—criticises sanctions and trade restrictions as harmful to Slovakia’s strategic interests, particularly in energy security and economic stability. It emphasises the need for a sovereign foreign policy that prioritises national interests over external pressures.

It should be noted that Slovak President Peter Pellegrini refused to call a referendum regarding EU sanctions against Russia on June 4. He cited three key reasons for rejecting the resolution. First, he questioned the vague reference to the “Slovak Republic,” asking whether it applied to state institutions, businesses, or local governments—an ambiguity that could potentially spark constitutional disputes. Second, he noted the lack of clarity around the term “Russia,” pointing out that it was unclear whether this referred solely to the Russian state, individuals, companies, or even entities from third countries sanctioned for aiding Russia. Lastly, Pellegrini criticiwed the proposal for failing to define which sanctions are considered harmful or to identify who would be responsible for evaluating their impact on Slovak citizens and businesses.

In turn, Andrej Danko, vice-speaker of the Slovak parliament and head of the SNS party, said he was shocked by the president's refusal to announce a referendum on the cancellation of sanctions against Russia, as the head of state, in case of any doubts in the petition, should have referred it to the Constitutional Court for evaluation before making a decision. 

By Sabina Mammadli