Police, prosecutors launch separate probes into South Korea's martial law controversy

South Korean authorities have launched investigations into President Yoon Suk Yeol’s recent and short-lived declaration of martial law. 

Both police and prosecution have formed dedicated teams to address the matter, Caliber.Az reports referring to Korean media.

The police have assembled a specialized team of approximately 120 officers to examine four complaints alleging treason, mutiny, and abuse of power by President Yoon and other officials involved. These complaints stem from Yoon’s declaration of martial law on December 3 and its subsequent repeal the following day.

The prosecution has created a special investigation headquarters, led by Park Se-hyun, head of the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office. Military prosecutors are collaborating on the investigation, given the involvement of senior military officials and the temporary deployment of troops during the event.

Army Chief of Staff Gen. Park An-su revealed on December 5 that he had offered to resign following the imposition of martial law. His resignation, however, was rejected by President Yoon, who cited the need for stability during what he described as a "grave security situation." In contrast, Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun, who reportedly advised Yoon to declare martial law and directed military deployment to the National Assembly, had his resignation accepted.

During an emergency parliamentary defence committee session, Park disclosed details of the military's role in enforcing martial law, including troop presence at the National Assembly. The opposition-controlled National Assembly voted to nullify the martial law decree, prompting its formal annulment by the president after a cabinet meeting.

Police are also pursuing treason charges against Yoon, filed by the opposition party “Revival of Korea” and a coalition of 59 activists. The allegations extend to Kim Yong-hyun, Gen. Park An-su, and Interior Minister Lee Sang-min. The opposition has called for investigations into all individuals involved, with a focus on holding them accountable for the brief imposition of martial law.

The administration justified the martial law declaration as a response to alleged “anti-state activities” by opposition forces. The military's brief presence at the National Assembly sparked widespread controversy, with critics questioning the proportionality and necessity of the measure.

As investigations continue, the situation underscores the deepening political divisions in South Korea and raises concerns over the use of emergency powers in democratic governance.

By Tamilla Hasanova