Azerbaijan considers US assistant secretary of state’s biased remarks as blow to ties Foreign Ministry's statement

The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry has said that it considers US Assistant Secretary of State James O’Brien’s biased remarks as a blow to the US-Azerbaijan relations.

In a statement published on November 16, the ministry underlined that the one-sided and biased remarks made by the US Assistant Secretary of State James O’Brien at the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Subcommittee on Europe hearing on November 15, 2023, are counterproductive, baseless and unacceptable, Caliber.Az reports.

“We consider the hearings and delivered remarks as a blow to the Azerbaijan-US relations in bilateral and multilateral formats. The groundless accusations voiced against Azerbaijan are irrelevant and undermines peace and security in the region.

While touching upon the latest situation in the region and circumstances that led to the 19-20 September counter-terrorism measures by Azerbaijan, the State Department representative ignored to mention the major challenge that led to such an action by Azerbaijan, namely the illegal stationing of more than 10,000 Armenian armed forces in contrary to the norms and principles of international law, and the Tripartite Statement of November 10, 2020. Furthermore, the Azerbaijani side has repeatedly stated in all the meetings, including with the US side that the mentioned forces are a source of threat in the region, and urged an immediate withdrawal of these forces.

Moreover, the US side while mentioning the importance of taking forward the peace process, forgets to mention that for more than two months Armenia has not been responding to Azerbaijan’s proposals on the peace agreement, thus delaying the process. Despite the fact that it was Azerbaijan who has initiated the peace process with basic principles and the necessity of signing the peace agreement, including the need for demarcation/delimitation of borders and opening up the communication lines, Assistant Secretary of State refrained from noting that the efforts in these areas were undermined and derailed by Armenia for the last three years. In contrary to Armenia, Azerbaijan has always respected the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Armenia, that was also reconfirmed in the Prague meeting in October 6, 2022.

Azerbaijan, not only following the 2020 44-Day War, but also for almost 30 years of occupation of its lands, has been committed to the norms and principles of international law and the peace process. In contrary, the US side being a mediator has never urged Armenia, as an aggressor and a destabilizing source in the region, to act in line with international law and withdraw from the territories of Azerbaijan and end the occupation, which lays a responsibility on the US side as well. Additionally, it was also an accountability of the US side that it has not prevented the double-standard approach, while being a side supporting the separatist regime, was the only country to officially fund this regime and facilitated their representative visits and meetings with the officials in the United States on a regular basis.

The United States, as a non-regional country, through its actions and statements is undermining transportation security efforts of the regional countries. It is well known to the US side that Armenia has not fulfilled its obligations arising from paragraph 9 of the 2020 Tripartite Statement, which led Azerbaijan to decide to build alternative roads. It is the sovereign right of Azerbaijan to agree with neighboring countries how to build communication lines, that also includes an agreement with Iran related a route to its Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic. Against this backdrop, Azerbaijan also reconfirms the priority of the '3+2' format (Azerbaijan-Armenia-Türkiye-Russia-Iran) for the security of the region. Therefore, any comments that undermines these efforts are inappropriate. 

With regard to remarks by James O’Brien about the waiver to the 907 Section, it seems that the US side is again repeating the same mistake it made in 1992, when Azerbaijan was sanctioned with this amendment, despite being a state who faced an aggression and occupation. It was also the US side who has decided to waive the 907 Section in 2001, when Azerbaijan has supported the US counter-terrorism efforts worldwide following 9/11 attacks.

 It was Azerbaijan, who has extended a helping hand to the US side by opening up its air space routes, the Northern Distribution Network and its logistics capabilities. It was Azerbaijan who was among the first nations who fought shoulder to shoulder with the US side in Afghanistan. Azerbaijan was also the last partner nation to leave Afghanistan. Therefore, it turns out that the US side has always considered the support of Azerbaijan as occasional, while it should be reminded that the history has always repeats itself. Such an indifferent action by the US side not to waive the 907 Section is an ill-disposed step towards Azerbaijan. 

Additionally, the remarks that 'Azerbaijan’s use of force eroded the trust and raised doubts regarding Baku’s commitment to a comprehensive peace with Armenia' has no value bearing in mind that it was Azerbaijan who was the victim of aggression and use of force for almost 30 years. Azerbaijan once again underlines that, in line with the Article 51 of the UN Charter, it had the legitimate right to use the force to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Concerning the statement that the US side has cancelled high-level bilateral meetings and engagements, which were initiated by the US side with Azerbaijan, and “there cannot be “business as usual” in our bilateral relationship,” it should be noted that the relations could not be one-sided. Consequently, the same approach will be applied equally by Azerbaijan. In these circumstances, we consider the possibility of high-level visits from the United States to Azerbaijan inappropriate as well.

Moreover, such a unilateral approach by the United States could lead to the loss of the mediation role of the United States. Under these circumstances, it is important to note that we do not consider possible to hold the proposed meeting on the level of the Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia, in Washington on November 20, 2023. 

International law norms and principles have always been a priority for Azerbaijan in its foreign policy. Azerbaijan will always act in line with its international obligations. At the same time, Azerbaijan will resolutely and adequately address all the negative steps against its national interest,” the statement reads.