Growing need for standardizing format of Paris Climate Agreement actions New study breaks down NDCs
Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are key components of the Paris Agreement, where countries outline their commitments to reducing emissions. Submitted every five years to the UNFCCC, these documents track progress and encourage more ambitious climate action. While NDCs are often assessed for their emissions targets, they also provide insight into national priorities, challenges, and approaches to sustainability.
A recent study identified 21 key topics within NDCs, grouped into seven themes, including development, mitigation targets, and climate change impacts. Highlighting it's findings, an article by The Conversation publication sheds light on how climate priorities differ across countries.
Wealthier nations, such as the US, Japan, and the EU, tend to focus on emissions reduction but often lack specific policies or regulatory measures. For example, the EU’s first NDC was a concise 1,000-word document with broad targets but little detail on implementation. Similarly, the US’s 2021 NDC sets a goal of reducing emissions by 50-52% below 2005 levels by 2030 but provides minimal information on concrete policies to achieve this.
In contrast, developing nations integrate climate policy with broader development goals, emphasizing economic growth, social justice, and adaptation. Many also stress the need for financial and technological support from wealthier nations. Venezuela’s 2021 NDC, at 76,000 words, is the longest submission and links climate action to a larger eco-socialist development vision.
Despite resource limitations, some developing countries have produced highly transparent and detailed NDCs. Ethiopia’s 2021 submission includes sector-specific emissions projections and clear policy measures. Vanuatu’s 2022 NDC systematically links policy actions to sustainable development goals and specifies the international financial support needed for implementation. These examples show how lower-income nations not only integrate climate action into development plans but also outline clear pathways for execution.
Climate justice and fairness
The differences in NDCs raise important questions about climate justice. Should developed nations, with historically high emissions, bear the greater financial burden, or should developing countries receive support while continuing economic growth? This also brings up concerns about ensuring a just transition for industries and regions affected by emissions reductions. Many NDCs from developing nations reflect these concerns, balancing environmental goals with social and economic priorities.
How climate pledges have evolved
Early NDCs were broad and lacked specifics, but recent updates include more details, often breaking down mitigation strategies by sector. However, transparency remains a challenge—many pledges still lack clarity on financing and implementation, leaving uncertainty about whether countries will meet their commitments.
Country clusters and climate priorities
Using topic modeling, researchers identified nine groups of countries with similar climate approaches. Brazil, Russia, and former Soviet states prioritize economic impacts of climate action, while Small Island Developing States (SIDS) emphasize adaptation and international support. These clusters highlight the trade-offs countries face, shaped by economic models, political ideologies, and resource availability.
The lack of a uniform format for NDCs makes it difficult to compare commitments and measure progress. Some countries submit detailed reports, while others provide only brief summaries. A standardized reporting system—incorporating emissions baselines, sector-specific targets, and clear methodologies—could improve transparency and accountability. It would also help identify gaps and best practices for international cooperation.
As the next round of climate negotiations approaches, clearer commitments and greater accountability are crucial to achieving the Paris Agreement’s goals.
By Nazrin Sadigova