Evolution of stupidity Azerbaijan has "medical treatment protocol"

Yerevan’s hypocritical actions have reached their peak. The statements made by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, and Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan, who are trying to nullify the agreements reached in Brussels in a peculiar way, are such a funny theatre of stupidity, absurdity and lies that it even deserves slight applause for a mediocre game. Yerevan may get a very tough response from Baku even outside the diplomatic field. Secretary of the Armenian Security Council Armen Grigoryan was the quickest to guess. We have already reported with reference to the Armenian media that through internal channels he asked the Azerbaijani side to forgive him for the trip to Khankendi that was not coordinated with Baku.

Mirzoyan was engaged in verbiage on the eve of the meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and distorted the essence of the negotiation process in Brussels.

“The point of view of the Armenian side regarding the five points proposed by Azerbaijan is unchanged. We have already said that there is nothing unacceptable in the proposals submitted by Azerbaijan on March 10, 2022. Another thing is that these proposals do not touch upon all issues of the Armenia-Azerbaijan comprehensive peace agenda. By our response to the co-chairing countries of the OSCE Minsk Group, we have added an issue to the agenda and, therefore, we are ready to continue the peace talks. This was once again confirmed by Pashinyan during recent discussions in Brussels,” Mirzoyan noted.

That is, let's emphasise Mirzoyan's unprecedented lies. It has also reached a special peak when the foreign minister declares something that is not mentioned in official documents. Baku is not interested in Pashinyan’s babbling on the sidelines of the Brussels talks. However, President of the European Council Charles Michel did not say a single word about the “peace agenda” in the Armenian style in his statement made following the meeting in Brussels. The OSCE Minsk Group with its completed activity is not mentioned either.

Instead of stopping telling lies, Mirzoyan started blaming Azerbaijan. Stating that as “Azerbaijan does not hear or does not try to hear this point of view, this gives the Armenian side reason to doubt the sincerity of the Azerbaijani side’s intention to achieve peace”.

He also spoke about Azerbaijan’s allegedly "inconsistent negotiations" and this generally raises questions about Mirzoyan’s adequate thoughts.

Azerbaijan accuses Mirzoyan of interpreting the essence of the negotiation process upon the Brussels line in a completely false way.

There is also complete nonsense “that Azerbaijan allegedly seeks to ruin the peace process and continue its policy of ethnic cleansing through the use of force”, which is even more difficult to comment on.

It is unclear how this is generally connected with the negotiations in Brussels. What is the expression "ethnic cleansing" during which Charles Michel mentioned at least a word about such a debate on this topic?

Apparently, it is worth making a reference to the inadequacy of Mirzoyan, who clearly confuses Brussels with Marseille or even with Moscow.

Mirzoyan should be also blamed for the expression “ethnic cleansing”. This unfortunate politician who was punished by his compatriots on the night of November 10, 2020, obviously, meant regaining control over Lachin by Baku, which is clearly stated in a tripartite statement.

Apparently, Mirzoyan even forgot about this paragraph of the above-mentioned document as a result of his furious compatriots’ actions that ill-fated night.

In general, it is worth noting that this ally of Pashinyan, who voices non-diplomatic rhetoric against Azerbaijan and every time telling lies about the negotiation process, is an absurd figure in the Armenian political arena. In general, it is hard not to notice that the Armenian foreign policy is devaluing.

Yerevan does not even try to look serious. Proceeding from the current political agenda, Armenian Defence Minister Suren Papikyan travels to the US while the foreign minister - to Moscow. That is, Yerevan thinks that it will be able to get some dividends from the Kremlin or, on the contrary, agree on something serious in Washington. There is such an Armenian trick. Who is it generally designed for? This is a big question.

The recent statements made by Pashinyan and Mirzoyan are generally a clear act of political dementia. Today they say and do one thing, while tomorrow, having forgotten about everything, they do completely different things.

In this sense, Azerbaijan is not a philanthropist, not a brother and not a mentor, and does not feel much sympathy for Armenia’s political bullshit.

Azerbaijan, as a doctor may prescribe shock therapy for Yerevan, using not only political means but also methods of force to treat Armenian stubbornness and dementia. It is painful but effective.